Identifying Core Competence
Criteria for setting objectives
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant I
Quadrant II
Quadrant III
Quadrant IV
Need for Integration
Remult's Criteria to Evaluate Strategy
Process of Evaluating Strategies
- Provides potential access to a wide variety of markets
- Should make a significant contribution to the perceived customer benefit of the end products
- Should be difficult for competitors to imitate and it will be difficult if it is a complex harmonization
- Customers: who are the firms customers
- Products or services: what are the firms major product or services
- Markets: Geographically where does the firm compete
- Technology: Is the firm technologically current?
- Concern for survival, growth and profitability
- Philosophy: what are the basic beliefs, values, aspirations and ethical priorities of the firm
- Self Concept: what is the firms distinctive competence
- Concern for public image
- Concern for employees
Criteria for setting objectives
- Suitable
- Measurable
- Feasible
- Acceptable
- Flexible
- Motivating
- Understandable
- Commitment
- Participation
- Linkages
- I, II, and IV Grow and Build
- III, V, and VII Hold and Maintain
- VI, VII, and IX Harvest and Divest
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quadrant I
- Market Development
- Market Penetration
- Product Development
- Forward Integration
- Backward Integration
- Horizontal Integration
- Concentric Diversification
Quadrant II
- Market Development
- Market Penetration
- Product Development
- Horizontal Integration
- Divesture
- Liquidation
Quadrant III
- Retrenchment
- Concentric Diversification
- Horizontal Diversification
- Conglomerate Diversification
- Liquidation
Quadrant IV
- Concentric Diversification
- Horizontal Diversification
- Conglomerate Diversification
- Joint Venture
- Concerned with entire organisation
- Resource allocation
- Diversification
- Portfolio Management
- Business, divisional, or strategic business unit (SBU) strategy
- What product or service to offer
- How to compete
- Strategy within business
- Functional plans
Need for Integration
- Avoid duplication and wastage of resources
- Trasfer pricing
- Information sharing
- Knowledge transfer
Remult's Criteria to Evaluate Strategy
- Consistency
- Consonance
- Feasibility
- Advantage
Process of Evaluating Strategies
- Reviewing bases of strategy (IFE EFE)
- Measuring organisational performance
- compare actual results with expected
- investigate deviations
- evaluate individual performance
- examining the progress in meeting the objectives
- Taking Corrective Actions
Characteristics of Effective Evaluation System
- Economical and simple
- timely information
- true picture of what is happening
- should not dominate decision
- foster mutual understanding, trust and common sense